Tags
Benji Schwimmer, Coming Out, Confirmation bias, Mormon, Religion and Spirituality, So You Think You Can Dance
Confirmation bias is the naturally tendency of ALL of us to favor facts and testimonials that confirm our beliefs or hypotheses. We all do it…in politics, religion, values and morals. When a topic is emotionally charged it’s even more likely. Confirmation bias affects the way we search for information, the way we interpret information and the way we remember the facts of the past. Bottom line, we weigh more heavily facts and information that support what we already think we know.
I saw confirmation bias play out this week as I observed some recent developments in the MOHO (Mormon homosexual) community regarding two recent contrasting stories of LDS men coming out… The first is the Story of Benji Schwimmer. The second is the coming out of a married blogger.
As a huge fan of So You Think You Can Dance I actually didn’t really know much about Benji Schwimmer, the winner of season 2. I didn’t get into the show until about season 5. Apparently, he was a faithful Mormon until about a year ago. He was a Mormon like I was a Mormon…he bought into ALL of it and pursued it with his whole heart. He served a mission, came home and began a scrupulous path of trying to live with homosexuality within a faithful Mormon framework. If you are only interested in the coming out portion of his story jump right to part 3. Parts 1& 2 talk about his earlier life and his time on SYTYCD. When I watched him detail his story I felt like he was putting words to what I had felt at that age. Even his final reason for leaving the church and coming out confirmed everything else I felt and have believed since.
I likewise hadn’t ever read The Weed blog before. This is a story on the other end of the MOHO spectrum. This blogger is a gay Mormon, who is out and yet remains married to a woman. As I read his story I thought to myself that he MUST be feeling the same hole in his soul that I felt as I tried to manufacture happiness out of that arrangement. I respect his ability to choose his own path but I highly doubt the wisdom of it.
See, it appears that even I did it! I put much more stock in Benji’s story and personally discounted the MOHO blogger’s based on which one best aligns with my beliefs and my personal path. The truth is, however, that I’ve been in BOTH of their shoes. I’ve lived both lives. I actually believe everything both of them claim to have experienced. I also respect their right to tell their own stories. It’s what other people will interpret that concerns me.
If you read the comment sections of both stories they are also almost identical, but coming from opposite sides of the spectrum. For example, can you guess which story this comment belongs to?
So so profound XXX! What an incredibly brave and loving thing to share your story with us. I was so touched by your honesty, your wisdom, and your strength. Thank you, thank you!
Or this one:
Wow! What an impressive, wonderful man with such an important message. I hope many, many Mormons — both gay and straight — will see this.
Or this one:
Wow, I am so very impressed. I am sure that many people will be helped by you telling your story with such clarity and love.
Or this one:
That echoes so many things I’ve thought were true about homosexuality. Thanks for sharing your experience and paving the way for hopefully a lot more people to believe in the possibilities that you are proving exist.
Or this one:
Really good interview. It was hard to listen to the mental somersaults this man has gone through. Any God worth worshiping would only want joy for his creations. Learn to be comfortable with uncertainty and find our genuine self.
Anyone who already believes it is OK to come out of the closet and rise above the LDS faith gives Benji kudos for his bravery; anyone who already believes it is a better choice to marry in the temple and stay LDS gives the Weed Blogger kudos for his bravery. I see Facebook friends sharing both stories accordingly… all my gay MOHO friends sharing Benji’s; all my Mormon friends sharing links to MOHO blogger’s.
It’s fascinating to see confirmation bias play out so blatantly.
As far as my own opinions go, it was hard to expose myself to both stories.
Seeing how Benji beat himself up so scrupulously because of his religious upbringing and adamantly defended it to the end reminded me of myself. In part 3, watch him describe the last straw when he finally gives himself permission to walk away from the church. The mental gymnastics and internal wrangling that it took for him to reach that point where he needed a “sign” was heartbreaking…for me especially because I needed that sort of BIG moment too (Start at around 1:02 in part 3 if you can’t commit to the whole thing). And looking back I see how unnecessary it was. In retrospect it’s simply OK to be gay. It shouldn’t be so damn hard to be yourself.
In contrast, the MOHO blogger titled his coming out post “Club Unicorn” because he claims that he is something that people don’t believe exists…a happily faithful gay Mormon married man. That of course is ridiculous. There are far more men like him than there are Benjis. There have always been gay men married who made it work…in and out of the church. And I’m sure those marriages spanned the full spectrum of happy to unhappy. His path is the traditional, more common path. Of course, he has upset the apple cart a bit by being open about his homosexuality and by being open with his wife. His openness is really the only unusual part of his story. His story itself is the more common one in human and specifically Mormon history. Countless men throughout time have chosen his same path because that’s the only option they had.
He doesn’t claim it in his post, but the Mormon takeaway from the blogger’s story is that his is the higher path and the one which others, if they weren’t so weak, should have followed. For that reason I believe it’s a dangerous one. His claim to happiness, while I believe it, is a very rare exception within his otherwise very common and very traditional path.
Fortunately we live in a time when that path is no longer the only choice. It’s not as if homosexuality is anything new. What’s new is the social construct that homosexuals are electing to build open long term relationships with each other and demanding the right and social privilege to do so in equal measure to their heterosexual brothers and sisters. That’s the new, previously unheard of path. It’s the one I’m proud to consider myself a part of today.
See Also:
Club Unicorn: In which I come out of the closet on our ten year anniversary
Ken said:
Regarding Mr. Weed: He didn’t specify that he’s never had gay sex. If he did, the memory of it is still with him and will likely “haunt” him the rest of his life, which will keep him from 100% focus on his wife.
If he has never had gay sex, and some day gives in to his natural desires, he’ll likely say what a young man said to me, in tears, after his first experience, which was, “I had no idea it would be so wonderful.” And he couldn’t say any more.
Beyond sex, his attraction to men will be a detraction to his relationship with his wife. She’ll always be wondering if he’s attracted to male friends they know, or to guys they happen to see. And she’ll wonder in each case how far he might go with them.
Further, she’s got to know that people can change.
The decision he made to marry a straight woman is in large part based on his belief in Mormonism. If he ever wakes up to the fraud that Mormonism is, what will they have left? I’d guess only a friendship.
Meanwhile, 5 lives are at risk of being deeply and negatively affected by what seems to me to be a very selfish choice.
When I was still married, and talked to my ex-wife and others in our families about leaving my marriage, they accused me of being selfish, and of taking the easy way out.
Au contraire, it would have been much easier to continue pretending to believe in Mormonism, and to believe that I could change myself into a truely straight man.
The more difficult choice, the one I chose, was to own up to the responsibility of having made a bad decision, of having caused pain and heartache to those I love, and to stop the pretense of believing I could be straight, and to start being true to my authentic self.
Regarding Mr. Schwimmer, I’m sorry he had such a struggle with Mormonism, and I’m glad he didn’t just hop into the temple with a girl – that hesitation definitely saved him and many others from a lifetime needless heartache. But I have the strong impression that his dancing and his “I’ll prove them wrong” and his dedication to his dream were all in his blood – with or without the church. For that, he has my respect.
dadsprimalscream said:
Thanks Ken. While Mr Weed takes full responsibility for his choice, we all know that his decisions weren’t made in a vacuum. The heavy influence of the LDS Church leads far too many down that path creating far too much havoc and heartache.
I’m also curious about the type of woman who subjects herself to that… a subject of a future blog post.
Andy said:
Ah, I just read this today, and Ken, I agree completely. There are times my wife accuses me of staying in our marriage because it is easier than owning up to who I am. In many way she is right, but at the same time she doesn’t want me to leave.
Scott said:
I’m with you all the way. I have lived in both stories. I’ve been a Mr. Weed and a Mr. So You Think You Can Dance mormon. It is odd, but interesting to watch the younger generations work these matters out their own way. I wish them the best, but at nearly 50 years old, I don’t come to quick kudos or conclusions for that matter since I know from experience that what I said then is very different from what I say now. Good luck to the both of them. As for the non LGBT folks siding with the one they favor more, just hold on and watch. They aren’t through yet.
dadsprimalscream said:
So true, Scott! They certainly aren’t through yet. Life is hard enough…why make it harder like that.
postmormongirl said:
I had a friend from high school post the Josh Weed story on Facebook. All I can say is that the post made me very, very uncomfortable. You’re right; it is a dangerous stance.
Trev said:
Oh, and I LOVED the sampling of comments and how you presented them. I forgot to mention that specifically and wanted to. That’s very clever and makes the point well.
dadsprimalscream said:
Ha thank you! Those comments I chose were so good that even I initially forgot which story they came from and had to go back n check again.
Trev said:
Great post! I think your analysis is spot-on. I’m grateful that someone else can accept both these people’s stories as valid while still being able to dispassionately analyze the effects of them in Mormondom and non-Mormondom.
It’s nice to be able to exercise confirmation bias and have it gratified. 😉
dadsprimalscream said:
Thanks Trev.
Clare Flourish said:
It would help if others did not judge. No, really did not judge. Saying that it is for God to judge not me but the Bible says gay lovemaking is an abomination and a sin and sinners go to Hell unless they repent is judging.
A friend reverted to presenting male because that was the only way she could see her children.
And- OH! If only people were content with not knowing, and with others thinking and feeling differently to them! Just rubbing along!
dadsprimalscream said:
True. Anytime you add a”but”to the statement you’re going to do exactly the opposite. In this case judge. Thanks for commenting